
Institutional Impact Plan
Turn scattered feedback, ad-hoc initiatives, and isolated complaints into a clear, measurable mental health impact story for your school, college, or workplace.


Research snapshot
Typical institutions underestimate both the hidden risk and the cost of not tracking mental health outcomes properly.
~1 in 7 students faces a mental health condition
Productivity loss is often higher than program cost
Most institutions lack preâpost metrics
Data is scattered across tools and sheets
Crises are visible, early risk is not
Clear metrics unlock smarter investment
Built for Schools. Colleges. Workplaces.
Designed for principals, deans, HR heads, and wellbeing leaders who need a clear, evidence-backed view of how mental health initiatives are actually working.


Reality check
You mostly hear problems only during crises
Different teams see different pieces
Activities happen, impact is unclear
Leaders ask for numbers, you have stories
Data is scattered across sheets & forms
Prioritising next steps feels guess-based
What You Get
A complete institutional view: screening, risk mapping, preâpost comparison, and decision-ready reporting.
Institution-wide screening summary
Risk & resilience heatmap
Outcome-focused indicators
Priority risk dashboard
Preâpost comparison (where applicable)
Leadership-ready narrative
Your Progress Roadmap
From first screening to board-level reporting, this roadmap keeps your measurement process structured and repeatableânot overwhelming.
Define objectives
Clarify what you want to see change â stress, retention, safety, engagement, or all of the above.
Baseline scan
Run a quick institution-wide screen to map current risk and protective factors.
Design KPIs
Select the core metrics that matter to your leadership and teams.
Track shifts
Compare data over time after programs, policies, or campaigns.
Report & refine
Share clear insights with leaders and fine-tune your wellbeing strategy.
Quick Stats
Most partners first notice clearer conversations with leadership once they see risk maps and trend lines instead of scattered feedback.
85%
Clarity Index
Goal: leaders see the same mental health picture
75%
Action Follow-through
Goal: more initiatives linked to concrete data
Baseline snapshot
Segmentation
Priority risks
Program linkage
Trend tracking
Leadership story

Start with a pilot
Decision-ready data
Leadership alignment
Targeted investment
Repeatable measurement
Evidence for stakeholders
Guided by experts
Ask Mr. Psyc Team
No. This report focuses on patterns and trends at an institutional level. Individual care, where needed, is handled through separate consent-based services.
Timelines depend on population size and data availability. A typical pilot can be completed within a few weeks from finalising tools and timelines.
Yes. Data is handled with confidentiality-first protocols, anonymised aggregation, and clear consent processes. Individual identities are protected.
No. Smaller schools, colleges, and organisations also benefitâespecially when they are just starting to structure mental health efforts.
Yes. The framework is designed to sit on top of your existing counselling, workshops, and wellness initiatives, so you can finally see their combined impact.
Trusted by leaders
Most institutions donât need more activities. They need structured measurement that tells them what is working, where risk is rising, and how to protect their people better.

For the first time, our leadership team saw mental health data alongside academic indicators. It changed the conversation completely.
Academic Dean
We finally moved from âwe think this is helpingâ to âhere is what changed and where we need to focus next.â
HR Head
The report helped us show our management why continued investment in mental health support is non-negotiable.
School Counsellor
Having one clear impact report across locations saved us weeks of manual consolidation.
Wellbeing Lead







